I would like to please readers and lovers of history great news. Recently Rutrekere appeared a complete collection from the archive of newspaper “Pravda” from 1917 to 1991, which up to this time in electronic form were stored on us servers in the archives of the American firm. Now everyone has the opportunity to socialize this archive, download it from the Events. The sooner the better. I do not think that the monopoly owners of the electronic archive from overseas who had cut his coupons, and their representatives in Russia would like the Libertines.
In our regular column “to read”, we present you another issue of the newspaper “Pravda” № 150, dated 26 June 1946, in which it will be about exposed embezzlement, fraud, other crimes against the Soviet people, and the punishment for such criminals.
See the article below. In conclusion, according to tradition – editors ‘ comments.
“The Ministry of State Control made an audit of financial-economic activity of some enterprises, institutions and organizations.
The audit revealed the facts of illegal receiving awards, use award funds for other purposes, and the assignment of individual officials cash and valuables.
The Director of the plant “Russian diesel” Solodukhin, N. V. and head of production M. G. Soloviev for 1945 and 1st quarter, 1946, willfully overstated output and unchanged prices of diesel spare parts and thereby artificially increase the implementation rate of the plan. Solodukhin, N. V. Solovyev and M. G. were engaged in market production of spare parts made before the war and at the time considered.
Artificial overstatement of implementation of the plan of commodity production gave the opportunity Soloduhina N. V. to illegally spent on the Bonuses of employees of the plant for “over-fulfillment” plan large sums of money.
In addition, Solodukhin, using his official position, illegally spent public funds on personal goals.
In relation to the audit of the facts, the Minister of State Control of the USSR was removed from the post of Director of deliveries “Russian diesel” N. Solodukhina. V. and he was impressed about in the amount of 6,000 rubles. the Head of the production Department of the plant “Russian diesel” Solovyov M. G. announced a severe reprimand, and it made about in the amount of 4,000 rubles.
Within five months of 1945 were illegally paid bonuses to the managerial and engineering-technical workers of the mine No. 19 of the trust “Wikinovel” combine “Tulaugol”.
The chief of this mine Kamchatov GN and former chief engineer of the mine Petrakov K. A., now working as the chief engineer of mine No. 18 were systematically produced additions to coal mining and reported to the trust about knowingly inflated data on the extraction of coal. So, in February 1945, the plan of coal production at the mine was completed 98.3 percent, reports the implementation of the plan is shown at 102.4% in March instead of 99.9% is shown 102.1% in April instead of 99.4% is shown 101,8%, etc.
Anti-state practice of making exaggerated reports were carried out with the purpose of obtaining premiums.
A PostScript at the mine No. 19 knew managing trust “Seminovel” Pronin X. G. and chief engineer F. L. SOLODKY, who also illegally received the award.
By order of the Minister of State Control, the head of the mine No. 19 of the trust “Wikinovel” Kamchatov GN and the chief accountant of the mine № 19 “Wikinovel” poles S. G. dismissed and prosecuted.
The Manager of the trust “Wikinovel” X. G. Pronin and the chief engineer of the trust Solodamu F. L. announced a severe reprimand. In addition, they produced about 7,500 RUB on each.
Pronin and licorice warned that, admitting them in the future additions of coal mining, they will be dismissed and prosecuted.
Director of the Dnepropetrovsk plant of metallurgical equipment zhernovaya N. V., chief engineer of the F. I. Chernyshenko and the chief accountant of the plant P. I. olkhovyk throughout 1945 was to artificially increase the implementation rate of the plan of gross output by raising prices unchanged 26/27, as well as the inclusion in the report of the finished tubing products, manufactured before the war and at the time considered.
Grossly violated at the plant and award process for the implementation of the plan on commodity output item and by order.
So, at the mechanical shop paying a premium for the seven months of 1945 was to be made, as the plan for commercial products was performed in the range of 75.2%. However, the premium for these months had been illegally accrued and paid on the basis of false data on the implementation of the plan for gross output.
In connection with the identified revision of the facts by order of the Minister of State Control of the USSR, the Director of the Dnepropetrovsk plant of metallurgical equipment zhernovaya E. P. was dismissed, and the chief engineer of the plant F. I. Chernyshenko and chief accountant P. I. Olkhovyk announced a severe reprimand. In addition, Chernyshenko made about the size of 9,000 rubles, and the Olkhovyk — 6.600 RUB.
Audit factory “KATEK” of the Ministry of the automotive industry established that the Director of the plant G. V. Burakov included in the product release incomplete products and presented in the Chapter false — inflated reporting data on the implementation of the production program of the plant. In October 1945 they were artificially high rate of implementation of the plan, the PA is 3.3% in November and 5.8% in January 1946 to 2.4% in March to 3.3%.
Burakov V. G. and chief engineer of the plant Aunapu F. F. has not organized proper control over the observance of technological discipline and the technical conditions of production of automotive and tractor electrical equipment and allowed the supply to consumers of substandard products.
The chief accountant of the factory Side B. I. has not organized proper accounting of production. The quality of the parts to be processed, recorded in the outfits with the words. A single accounting document for delivery of the product is not installed. The delivery of the finished products in the warehouse are processed on scraps of paper, without the necessary details. This situation, given the given the opportunity to attribute neistovaya details. In 1945, PostScript in the details reached 20-25%.
The audit also identified the plant gross violations of staffing and financial discipline.
Zam. Director of plant Stupel O. A. is not organized proper storage and usage of inventory and made a large performance overhead. Waif spent and squandered on the individual plant materials for production.
By order of the Minister of State control of the Director of the plant G. V. Burakov was dismissed and he made about in the amount of 6,000 rubles.
Chief engineer F. F. Aumanu for unsatisfactory monitoring of technological discipline in the production and release of defective products— announced a severe reprimand, and it made about in the amount of 6,000 rubles.
Zam. Director of plant Stupel O. A. poor storage of material assets, failure to take action against the perpetrators of the shortage of materials and the wastage assumption — announced the reprimand and it produced about in the amount of 3,000 RUB.
The chief accountant of the factory “KATEK” Side B. I. for an overrun of payroll on non — contingent- made about cash in the amount of 2.000 RUB
The chief engineer of Gravitoelectric Ministry of automobile industry Lokshin G. O. for illegal orders to release incomplete products, announced a severe reprimand.
Stroytrest № 11 the Ministry of aviation industry in 1945, the plan for the construction and exploitation of residential houses was carried out only 78.2%. Managing trust Kuznetsov, K. D. and chief engineer of the Lviv P. B., trying to hide the failure of the implementation of the plan and illegally to award systematically produced registry is actually backlog and presented to the parent organization, deceitful data.
So, in the report for 1945 Kuznetsov and Lviv was assigned 10.069 square feet of living space, not actually finished construction.
Presenting a fictitious financial data on the implementation of the construction plan, stroytrest No. 11 for November and December 1945, illegally received bonuses, including illegally obtained the award managing trust Kuznetsov, chief engineer of Lviv, the chief accountant of Strazov N. M., head of the planning Department of the trust Kagan D. I.
For example, these leaders have produced registry and heads of building firms. Head of stroycenter No. 3 Bulanov K. J. included in the report as finished construction and commissioned at factory No. 24 in December 1945 80 houses with an area of 2,600 square meters. In fact, these houses were not ready.
Chief accountant building trust № 11 Strazov N. M. not only did not control the reporting of putting into exploitation of dwelling houses, but also covers the registration. Knowing that the construction of a number of residential object known was not finished, Strazov in accounting, finished report the trust has shown the implementation of the plan in real terms by 100 percent.
By order of the Minister of State Control, the former Manager of construction and Assembly trust No. 11 D. K. Kuznetsov, who now works as the Manager of the trust No. 22 of the Ministry of aviation industry, announced a severe reprimand, and it produced about 9.000 in the amount of RUB
Kuznetsov, warned that the repetition in the future of this kind of illegal action it will be dismissed and prosecuted.
Chief engineer of construction and installation th trust No. 11 P. B. Lvov and the chief accountant of the trust of Strazov N. M. dismissed. In addition, in the Lviv produced about 9.000 in the amount of RUB and Stromtsova in the amount of 2,250 RUB.
Systematically appropriated material values of Stalin’s authorized procurement station of the Novosibirsk regional office of Glavsnab of the Ministry of meat and dairy industry of the USSR Gubitchev B. A.
In December 1945, Gubitchev submitted to the accounting Department of the Novosibirsk office of fictitious statement on the issue to workers of food. As established by the revision, Gubitchev receipts to the workers of this statement was forged, and the products assigned.
Practiced Gubitchev and drafting fictitious accounts. For example, he had drawn up a bogus account No. 9 of 5 February 1946 on vacation Stalinist slaughterhouse of workwear and other products more than 6 thousand rubles. These goods to the warehouse of meat processing plant have been received, so as Gubitchev they were assigned. In the same way they were assigned more than 4 thousand. the goods allegedly allotted to them on account № 18 in February of Stalin’s database Gamasomorpha.
By order of the Minister of State Control over the appropriation of material values of Stalin’s authorized procurement station of the Novosibirsk regional office of Glavsnab gubitchev the B. A. dismissed and prosecuted.
Appropriated funds by drawing up fictitious statements on the payment of loading and unloading operations authorized Tomsk procurement point of Glavsnab of the Ministry of meat I dairy industry of the USSR A. K. Solovyov
Job Solovyov fictitious statements were accountant Tomsk base masloprom Lazovsky I. A., working part-time accountant Tomsk procurement point of Glavsnab. In these statements Soloviev and Lazovsky forged receipts of workers in receipt of the money. By drawing up fictitious statements and forgery of receipts in them nightingales and Lazovsky during 1945 appropriated more than 40 thousand rubles of public funds.
By order of the Minister of state control of the USSR Tomsk authorized procurement station Solov’ev A. K. accountant and Tomsk base masloprom Lazovsky I. A. dismissed and prosecuted.
The embezzlement of public funds uncovered at plant No. 70 of the Ministry of agricultural machinery.
Former chief accountant of the division of work supply Administration of the Ministry of agricultural engineering Zavyalov M. O. and the former head of the sales Department of factory No. 70, I. K. Begiashvili being sent to Asia for harvesting of dried fruits, fraudulently received from different organizations a large sum of cash and appropriated it.
Zavialov used various methods of deception of the state organizations. He had invented a fictitious transaction for the payment of fictitious invoices for the purchase of dried fruit, under the guise of repayment of the alleged debt, transferred funds from one organization to another, and subsequently he received them in cash. So, to the account of the plant № 574 Zavialov transferred from Tashkent Agency of Glavsnab of the Ministry of agricultural machinery, by specifying in the banking errands fictional account numbers, a large sum of money. Former chief accountant of the plant № 574 Studentov I. M. and a former head of the financial Department of the same plant Murawski, M. I., Zavialov listed after receiving the money, gave it to him from cash factory cash.
In the same way Zavialov received the money and at the farm. Frunze, Leninabad district.
In an effort to conceal the appropriation of money, Zavyalov went to the criminal connection with a representative of the plant No. 70, I. K. Begiashvili which using Zavyalova also appropriated large sums of money.
Their fraudulent transactions Zavialov and Begiashvili committed with the complicity of the Director of the plant № 70 Prihodskogo G. A., which is received from Begiashvili a large sum of cash and all sorts of material valuables: carpets, cloth, wool, and other things. Complicit in all these crimes was also assistant Director of the plant № 70 Zilberkweit A. V.
By order of the Minister of State Control of the USSR Pregolskii G. A., Zilberkweit A.V., Zavyalov M. O. and I. K. Begiashvili for fraud and misappropriation of public funds removed from their posts and brought to justice.”
Editors ‘ comments:
To begin with, the conditions in which the above mentioned persons committed a crime. 1946, exactly a year since ending world War, after which, in spite of that rest was a luxury, after all, needed urgently to rebuild the postwar city, the farm, to feed people, to build infrastructure and so on. And at this time was the Soviet people who, using his official position, by deceit, for personal gain, placing myself above the rest, could encroach and usurp public wealth and good.
Let’s look at the situation from the other side – the punishment. Among rabid modern propaganda against Stalin, about the alleged billions baseless and cruel executions and repression for three spikelets, the newspaper “Pravda” tells the story of quite the opposite. The control system was built is quite transparent. The relevant authority carried out the inspection. Detected violations at their level and on the basis of fault, the national audit office has transferred the case to the special organs. Violators were attracted not only to a disciplinary responsibility and has paid the state suffered damage, but was able to ring out in full. However, without trial, anyone the state authorities in the USSR were not shot.
Note that involved the guilty person, no matter how high positions they hold, not the fake “grassroots workers”. In modern Russia, of course, it seems like a fairy tale, because the perpetrators – the big capitalists or high officials (Serdyukov, Chubais, etc.) go unpunished, leaving the direct perpetrators blame their “desires”, and about the compensation of the state criminals and say no.
K. Plankton, J. Pyltsov
© 2018, z-news.xyz. All rights reserved